Legal Opinion

Kotok v. Rossi

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided February 27, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Buchanan, V. C.

Complainant’s bill is for specific performance of contract of sale of lands, or at least is of a kind usually spoken of as coming within that category. It seeks to compel the conveyance to himself of certain lands comprised in contract of sale between himself as vendee and the defendants Bossi as vendors, the legal title to which lands was subsequently conveyed by the Bossis to the defendants DeFalco.

*328The DeEalcos move to strike out the bill on the ground that it fails to disclose a cause of action. This motion is therefore equivalent to demurrer under the old practice, and…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. HeadleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932
  2. Hollander v. AbramsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  3. Celendano v. BlazejewskiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  4. Koperski v. WiraNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
  5. Niemaseck v. Bernett Holding Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API