Legal Opinion

Koperski v. Wira

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided March 5, 1925PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The bill in this cause is filed for the specific performance of a contract for the exchange of properties, with an adjustment of the difference in values in cash. The bill alleges that "the contract was executed in duplicate and was duly acknowledged by all the parties, before Ralph B. Sanborn, Esq., master in chancery of New Jersey. The certificate of said acknowledgment by the said parties was not endorsed by said master on said agreement of exchange, and the said agreement, in duplicate, was immediately exchanged by the parties respectively."

The defendants' answer, among other things, sets…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. OttersonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1894
  2. Rittenhouse v. SwiecickiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922
  3. Potter v. SteerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  4. Kotok v. RossiNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1923
  5. O'Neill v. LinowitzNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. FlanaganNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
  2. Heinig v. SmellowNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API