Legal Opinion

In Re Johnson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 20, 2008No. 26555PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an attorney discipline case involving misconduct in three matters. The Commission on Lawyer Conduct Panel (Panel) unanimously recommended the following sanctions: (1) indefinite suspension; (2) respondent be required to pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings; and (3) respondent make restitution to the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection (Fund) and to victims in the amounts set forth herein.

The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) appeals and argues that the facts and similar case law call for a harsher sanction. For the reasons stated below, we are not persuaded that we should…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re LarkinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. In Re LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Matter of YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Hardee-ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  2. In Re HoustonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
  3. In re AtwaterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
  4. In Re JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API