In Re Johnson
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
This is an attorney discipline case involving misconduct in three matters. The Commission on Lawyer Conduct Panel (Panel) unanimously recommended the following sanctions: (1) indefinite suspension; (2) respondent be required to pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings; and (3) respondent make restitution to the Lawyers’ Fund for Client Protection (Fund) and to victims in the amounts set forth herein.
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC) appeals and argues that the facts and similar case law call for a harsher sanction. For the reasons stated below, we are not persuaded that we should…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re LarkinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- In Re LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
- Matter of YarboroughSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Hardee-ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- In Re HoustonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2009
- In re AtwaterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012
- In Re JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010