Legal Opinion

In re Larkin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 22, 1996No. 24369PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

In this attorney grievance matter, respondent conditionally admits that he has committed ethical violations and consents to a public reprimand. We accept respondent’s conditional admission and publicly reprimand him for his conduct.

The Knox Matter

Ms. Knox received a traffic ticket and retained respondent to represent her. Respondent did not advise Ms. Knox of her court date and as a result of her failure to appear in court or pay a fine by September 7, 1992, she was found guilty in her absence. Eventually, Ms. Knox retained another lawyer who was able to get the charges reduced. Ms. Knox then…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In the Matter of FousheeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re LarkinSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  2. Matter of HollerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  3. In Re MatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API