Hutchinson v. Reclamation District No. 1619
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.
In this action plaintiff had judgment against the defendant for the sum of $2,116 for and on account of certain dredger work done and performed by the plaintiff for the defendant district, from which judgment the defendant appeals.
The action is upon two counts: One upon an express contract ; the other upon quantum meruit.- The trustees of the district were included as defendants, but" their motion for a nonsuit was sustained by the trial court and the cause of action as against them dismissed. On the twenty-sixth day of November, 1919, at a meeting of the trustees of the defendant district,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Zottman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Reams v. CooleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Contra Costa Water Co. v. BreedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Buck v. City of EurekaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Flynn v. DoughertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jogani v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Hutchison v. Reclamation District No. 1619California Court of Appeal · 1927
- Arch Sellery, Inc. v. SimpsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- Arch Sellery, Inc. v. SimpsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1961