Legal Opinion
Springdale Donuts, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 2, 1999No. SC 15918PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CALLAHAN, C. J.
The sole issue in this appeal is whether contracts of insurance that the plaintiff, Spring-dale Donuts, Inc., purchased from the defendants, Aetna Casualty and Surety Company of Illinois, Farmington Casualty Company and Aetna Casualty and Surety Company,1 required the defendants to defend and to indemnify the plaintiff with respect to claims brought against *803it by two of its employees, Helen Ritch and her daughter, Tina Ritch (claimants). We conclude that they did not.
The following facts and procedural history are undisputed. The plaintiff is the operator of a Dunkin’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Torosyan v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Smedley Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BulaongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Kelly v. FigueiredoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- QSP, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Community Action for Greater Middlesex County, Inc. v. American Alliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Coregis Insurance Company v. American Health FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Schilberg Integrated Metals Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. FontaineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.