Legal Opinion
Canadian Fur Trappers Corp. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 8, 1988No. Court 86-07-00977, 86-05-00641PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
TSOUCALAS, Judge:
This matter is before the Court to determine whether certain of plaintiffs’ entries, subject to a countervailing duty order, were deemed liquidated by operation of law pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1504(d), and if not deemed liquidated, whether interest was properly assessed when Customs liquidated these entries.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs’ goods are subject to an outstanding countervailing duty order, T.D. 74-235. Therefore, plaintiffs deposited estimated countervailing duties upon the entry of its goods. Pursuant to § 751 of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Escoe v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Hancock v. TrainSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Mister Ralpho v. J. Raymond Bell, Chairman, Foreign Claims Settlement Commission of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Ambassador Division of Florsheim Shoe v. The United States, and Footwear Industries of America, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Canadian Fur Trappers Corp., and Meldisco, a Division of Melville Corp. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Mills v. MartinezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Wolff Shoe Co., Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Gates v. Raytheon Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rheem Metalurgica S/A v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.