Legal Opinion
Ambassador Division of Florsheim Shoe v. The United States, and Footwear Industries of America, Inc., Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 19, 1984No. Appeal 84-814PublishedCited by 55 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NICHOLS, Senior Circuit Judge.
The United States prosecutes this appeal to obtain our review of a summary judgment by the Court of International Trade (CIT) according to which the facts ascertained in a “Periodic Review” of a countervailing duty determination cannot be applied to entries in the period the review relates to, because by law the duties applicable to those entries must have been finally determined before the facts could have been known. We reverse.
Statement of the Case
The decision in question is reported at 577 F.Supp. 1016 (1983), and familiarity with it is assumed in what…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United Steelworkers of America v. WeberSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Miller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Timken Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Hercules Incorporated v. The United States, Wm. T. Thompson Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- National Corn Growers Ass'n v. BakerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- The Ad Hoc Committee of Az-Nm-Tx-Fl Producers of Gray Portland Cement v. The United States, Cemex S.A., and Apasco, S.A. De C.V.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.