Legal Opinion

Canadian Fur Trappers Corp., and Meldisco, a Division of Melville Corp. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 29, 1989No. 89-1060, 89-1061, 89-1062PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

Canadian Fur Trappers Corp. (Canadian Fur) and Meldisco, a division of Melville Corp., appeal the decision of the United States Court of International Trade, 691 F.Supp. 364 (Ct.Int’l Trade 1988), holding that these companies’ respective imported footwear entries which were subject to assessment of countervailing duties were not deemed liquidated, pursuant to 19 U.S.C. § 1504 (1982 and Supp. III 1985), when the U.S. Customs Service failed to liquidate the entries within 90 days after the dismissal of a lawsuit which challenged the rates of duty. In addition, Canadian Fur…

2Cases cited7 opinions

Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
Watt v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
Madison Galleries, Ltd. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
Oregon Steel Mills Inc. v. United States (Department of Commerce and International Trade Administration) and Pohang Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
Canadian Fur Trappers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

Fujitsu General America, Inc. (Successor-In-Interest to Teknika Electronics Corp.) v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
New Zealand Lamb Company, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
Brother Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1991
Mills v. MartinezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
Wolff Shoe Co., Plaintiff-Cross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.