Legal Opinion
Rosebud Enterprises, Inc. v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided May 30, 1996No. 21754PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SCHROEDER, Justice.
This is an appeal by Rosebud Enterprises, Inc. (Rosebud) from Idaho Public Utilities Commission (IPUC) Orders 25454, 25706, and 25787. The orders of the IPUC establish an avoided cost rate to be paid by Idaho Power Company (Idaho Power) for the purchase of electric capacity and energy from Rosebud.
i.
BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
A. Parties
Rosebud is the developer of a small power production “qualifying facility 5 ’ (QF) under the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 (PURPA), Pub.L. No. 95-617, 92 Stat. 3117 (codified as amended at 16 U.S.C.A. §§ 2601 — 2645…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- American Paper Institute, Inc. v. American Electric Power Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Utah-Idaho Sugar Co. v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Rosebud Enterprises, Inc. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- AW Brown Co., Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
- Key Transportation, Inc. v. Trans Magic Airlines Corp.Idaho Supreme Court · 1974
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Iindustrial Customers of Idaho Power v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
- Rosebud Enterprises, Inc. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1997
- Ryder v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Cole v. IPUCIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
- Cole v. IPUCIdaho Supreme Court · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.