Legal Opinion

Iindustrial Customers of Idaho Power v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 2000No. 25055PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Justice.

This is an appeal from an order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission granting respondent Idaho Power Company’s application for approval and accelerated recovery of certain deferred demand side management expenditures. We affirm.

I

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

A. Factual Background

During the mid to late 1980’s and early 1990’s, Idaho Power Company (the Company) implemented a variety of demand side management (DSM) programs designed to help reduce energy consumption and thereby defer acquisition of new and higher cost resources. Such programs included: “Good Cents Homes;”…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Natural Gas Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Intermountain Gas Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1975
  3. City of Los Angeles v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Boise Water Corp. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Idaho State Insurance Fund v. HunnicuttIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Board of Professional DisciplineIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Williams v. Idaho State Board of Real Estate AppraisersIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hulet v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  4. In Re Jay Hulet's Complaint Regarding Idaho Power Company's Irr. Buy-Back ProgramIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Cole v. IPUCIdaho Supreme Court · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API