Legal Opinion

Rosebud Enterprises, Inc. v. Idaho Public Utilities Commission

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided November 7, 1997No. 23641PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

This public utilities ease is a sequel to Rosebud Enterprises v. Idaho Pub. Util. Comm’n, 128 Idaho 624, 917 P.2d 781 (1996) (Rosebud I). We conclude that the Idaho Public Utilities Commission (IPUC) was correct in refusing to order Idaho Power Company (Idaho Power) to purchase electric capacity and energy from Rosebud Enterprises (Rosebud) at avoided cost rates that have been superseded.

I

THE BACKGROUND AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS

Rosebud is a developer of a small power production plant (the qualified facility) that is *4classified as a “qualified facility” under the Public Utility…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Meridian Joint School District No. 2Idaho Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Magic Valley Radiology, PA v. KolouchIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Rosebud Enterprises, Inc. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. AW Brown Co., Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Rosebud Enterprises, Inc. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Whitehall Wind, LLC v. Montana Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Idaho Power Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. EatonIdaho Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Idaho Power Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Idaho Power Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API