AW Brown Co., Inc. v. Idaho Power Co.
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BAKES, Chief Justice.
This case is an appeal from an order of the Idaho Public Utilities Commission denying appellant A.W. Brown, Inc.’s request that the PUC order Idaho Power to purchase electricity from Brown at an earlier, superseded cogeneration rate. We affirm the Commission’s decision.
Section 210 of the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act (PURPA) requires electric utilities to purchase electricity produced by cogenerators or small power producers (CSPP’s) that obtain qualifying facility (QF) status under Section 201 of PURPA. Pursuant to congressional directive, the Federal Energy…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boise Water Corp. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
- Grever v. Idaho Telephone CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- In Re the Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1955
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
- Utah-Idaho Sugar Co. v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Smith Cogeneration Management, Inc. v. Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Rosebud Enterprises, Inc. v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
- Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Idaho Public Utilities ComMissionIdaho Supreme Court · 1994
- Power Resource Group, Inc. v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Iindustrial Customers of Idaho Power v. Idaho Public Utilities CommissionIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.