Legal Opinion

Butterfield v. Duquesne Mining Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1947No. 4916PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STANFORD, Chief Justice.

For convenience herein we will term the appellant and appellee as plaintiff, and defendant, respectively, as they were styled in the trial court.

Plaintiff sued defendant for rent due, for restitution of the premises and for damages. Plaintiff had two written leases from his landlord for the premises located at 128 North Church Street, Tucson, Arizona, one lease being from January 9, 1945 to January 9, 1946, the other lease being from January 9, 1946 to January 9, 1950. Plaintiff took possession of the premises January 9, 1945.

On February 20, 1945, plaintiff subleased a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Wahlstrom v. ChristyArizona Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Byrd v. PetersonArizona Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Hawaiian Homes Commission v. BushHawaii Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Lane v. HognasonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  4. DVM Co. v. BrickerArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. DVM CO. v. BrickerArizona Supreme Court · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API