Legal Opinion

DVM Co. v. Bricker

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1983No. 16683-PRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMERON, Justice.

We granted review of a memorandum decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the trial court’s judgment holding that though there was a breach of a covenant of a lease, the breach was not “sufficiently material” to require a forfeiture of the lease. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Art. 6, § 5, Arizona Constitution. We reverse.

We consider the following issues:

1. While a forfeiture is pending in the courts, does acceptance of rent by the lessor from the lessee in possession of the property waive the lessor’s right to claim forfeiture?

2. Did the trial court err in excluding…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
  2. M. Karam & Sons Mercantile Co. v. SerranoArizona Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Bolon v. PenningtonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1967
  4. Butterfield v. Duquesne Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Wecht v. AndersonNevada Supreme Court · 1968

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Foundation Development Corp. v. Loehmann's, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. City of Phoenix v. BellamyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
  3. DVM Co. v. Bricker (In Re Bricker)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 1984
  4. DVM CO. v. BrickerArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Foundation Development Corp. v. Loehmann's, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API