Legal Opinion

Wahlstrom v. Christy

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1919No. Civil No. 1669PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Maricopa. R. C. Stanford, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

This is an action brought by Mamie Lee Wahlstrom in her individual capacity and as executrix of the estate of Joseph Wahlstrom, deceased, plaintiff, against William C. Christy, by Lloyd B. Christy, his attorney in fact, and Shirley Christy, defendants, to recover $5,276.74, alleged to be damages sustained through the act of defendants in terminating a lease entered into between defendants and deceased during his lifetime of certain premises described as the S. % of the N. % of the S. E. % and S. % of the S. E. 14 of the N. E. 14, of section 1, township 1 north, range 2 east, G-. & S. R. B. &…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lewis v. Ocean Navigation & Pier Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Sauer v. MeyerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Phoenix Title & Trust Co. v. HorwathArizona Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Chadwick v. WinnArizona Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Butterfield v. Duquesne Mining Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Christy v. WahlstromArizona Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API