Legal Opinion
Byrd v. Peterson
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided November 12, 1947No. 4921PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DON T. UDALL, Superior Judge.
The appellees, as plaintiffs in the lower' court, brought an action of forcible detain-er against appellants, as defendants in the lower court, to recover from them a portion of the building located at 128 North Church Street, Tucson, Arizona, consisting of three offices. The case was tried by' the court without a jury. .
A brief summary of the evidence discloses that on January 8, 1945, a lease was entered into between the appellees, as lessors, and A. E. Butterfield, as lessee, covering the aforesaid premises together with other property not herein concerned, for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Olds Bros. Lumber Co. v. RushingArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Hinton v. HotchkissArizona Supreme Court · 1946
- Buttner v. KasserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
- Mitchell v. YoungSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- McDonald v. MayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bevelheimer v. GierachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Frazier & Oxley, L.C. v. CummingsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- Bargain Mart, Inc. v. LipkisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Mac Enterprises, Inc. v. Del E. Webb Development Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Northridge Hospital Foundation v. Pic 'N' Save No. 9, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.