Legal Opinion
Loggins v. Kaiser Permanente International
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 14, 2007No. D048404PublishedCited by 69 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McDONALD, J.
Plaintiff Dianne M. Loggins filed this action against her former employer, defendants Kaiser Permanente International, Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., and Southern California Permanente Medical Group (collectively Kaiser), alleging her employment was terminated in retaliation for her complaint that her supervisor had discriminated against her because of her race. Kaiser contended Loggins’s employment was terminated because Kaiser’s investigation confirmed Loggins had devoted excessive work time and work resources to furthering her outside personal business, in…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Yanowitz v. L'OREAL USA, INC.California Supreme Court · 2005
- Morgan v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by69 opinions
- Nadaf-Rahrov v. the Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2008
- Wills v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Kelley v. Corrections Corporation of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
- Day v. Sears Holdings Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2013
- Rope v. Auto-Chlor System of Washington, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.