Legal Opinion

Caudle v. . Morris

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 20, 1912PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Peebles, J., at October Term, 1911, from Waxe.

1Per curiam

Botb parties appealed.

In the plaintiffs’ appeal tbe appellant docketed tbe record proper in apt time and asked for a certiorari tbat tbe case on appeal may be settled and sent up. It appearing tbat tbe judge bad failed to settle tbe case without any lacbes on tbe part of tbe appellant, tbe certiorari will issue.

In the defendants’ appeal tbe plaintiffs docketed in apt time tbe certificate required under Rule 17 and moved to dismiss defendants’ appeal. Tbe motion was granted. Tbe defendants thereupon moved to reinstate. It appears that the defendants had not docketed the record proper, but they…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pittman v. . KimberlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Burrell v. . HughesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
  3. Morrison v. . Cornelius and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  4. Devereux v. . BurgwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1850
  5. Perry v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Cox v. City of KinstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  3. In re StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Dare County v. North Carolina Department of InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Pope v. Righter-Parry Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API