Legal Opinion

Burrell v. . Hughes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1897PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Civil action, tried before McIver,J., and a jury, at Pali Term, 1896, of Obange Superior Court. There was judgment for the defendant and plaintiff appealed. The appellant applied in this court for a certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Ouriam:

The judgment was taken in Orange Superior Court at.August Term, 1896, and the appeal should have been docketed in this court at last term, Rule 5 of this court, and if without laches of the appellant, the “case on appeal” was nst then settled by the Judge, the appellant should have docketed the rest of the transcript and applied for a certiorari. Guano Co. v. Hicks, at this term; Shober v. Wheeler, 119 N. C., 471; Causey v. Snow, 116 N. C., 497; State v. Freeman, 114 N. C., 872; Pipkin v. Green, 112 N. C., 355; Porter v. R. Co., 106 N. C., 478; Stephens v. Koonce, 106 N. C., 255;…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Pittman v. . KimberlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. Porter v. Western North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  3. Peebles v. . BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  4. Graham v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Stephens v. . KoonceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  2. Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
  3. State v. . FarmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  4. State v. . TrullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. Stone v. . LedbetterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API