Legal Opinion

Pope v. Righter-Parry Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by F. W. McCurdy, intervenor, from Ferguson, J., at November Term, 1912, of Harnett.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, C. J".

The appellant, E. W. McCurdy, presents the same point upon another note in the same cause of Pope v. Lumber Co., above decided. The only difference is as to the amount of the note, which is $1,000.

We note that separate records were sent up in these two appeals. This was an unnecessary expense, as the appeals are in the same cause and present exactly the same question. Though, of course, both parties should appeal. If not, the judgment is suspended only as to the one which appeals (Rollins v. Love, 97 N. C., 210); yet it was not necessary to send up separate records.

It is true…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . VinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  2. Perry v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. Caudle v. . MorrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Jones v. . HoggardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  5. Rollins v. . LoveSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cody v. . HoveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API