Steinberg v. Goldstein
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
COUGHLIN, J. pro tem. *
This is an appeal from an order upon a petition by a receiver requesting instructions.
The plaintiff and defendant are licensed physicians and surgeons. In 1947, they formed a partnership to engage in the practice of medicine and surgery with principal offices in the city of Fresno, California.
On April 4, 1950, the plaintiff commenced this action for a dissolution of the partnership, an accounting, the appointment of a receiver, and damages. The plaintiff alleged that, without his consent, the defendant “opened an office for himself” in Visalia, using partnership funds…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hooper v. BarrantiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Lesser & Son v. SeymourCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Shunken v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Irer v. GawnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Bank of Woodland v. HeronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Prince v. HartingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980