Legal Opinion

Irer v. Gawn

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 16, 1929No. Docket Nos. 3727, 3728, 3729PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (R. L.), J.

From the judgment and findings covering a group of three consolidated cases which involved an accounting of a joint adventure to construct a bungalow court, several appeals were perfected and will be considered conjointly.

The plaintiff Irer owned three lots in the city of Los Angeles. December 1, 1923, he entered into a written contract with the appellant Gawn to engage in a joint adventure, by the terms of which they agreed to construct a bungalow court on these lots. For the purposes of this enterprise the lots were valued at $10,000. Gawn contributed $4,000, which he…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stackpole v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Butler v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Hughes v. DemundCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Jones v. Express PubLishing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Hughes v. HartmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Nelson v. AbrahamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Engineering Service Corp. v. Longridge Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
  3. Parker v. TrefryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Epstein v. StahlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. Kovacik v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API