Legal Opinion

Thomas v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 26, 2012No. 130PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

In this case, we review the issue of the admissibility of a confession given in the absence of Miranda warnings.1

Konnyack Thomas, Petitioner, having been contacted by police, agreed to speak with the officers at the station. Prior to his arrival, he spoke with his estranged v/ife who informed Thomas that the police wanted to speak to him about accusations of sexual abuse made by their daughter against Thomas. When he arrived at the station, Thomas met with two detectives and spoke with them for approximately an hour and a half, during which he confessed to touching his daughter…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Thompson v. KeohaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Howes v. FieldsSupreme Court of the United States · 2012

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Madrid v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  2. Green v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  3. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Moody v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Edwards v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API