Legal Opinion

Green v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 20, 2017No. 4/17PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

“Whether a witness can positively identify the [defendant] at the scene of the crime is often the cardinal facet of a determination of guilt.” Williams v. State, 364 Md. 160, 179, 771 A.2d 1082, 1093 (2001). In other words, “[identification testimony may be outcome determinative[.]” Id. at 174, 771 A.2d at 1090. “[H]ence, any solid preparation of a defense demands this information.” Id. at 174, 771 A.2d at 1090.

During discovery in a criminal case in a circuit court, Maryland Rule 4-263(d)(7)(B) requires the State to disclose to the defense, without the necessity of a request, “[a]ll relevant…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Attorney Grievance v. CassillyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Lee v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  4. Alarcon-Ozoria v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  5. Cagle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API