Legal Opinion

Howes v. Fields

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided February 21, 2012No. 10-680PublishedCited by 565 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Alito

The United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that our precedents clearly establish that a prisoner is in custody within the meaning of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U. S. 436 (1966), if the prisoner is taken aside and questioned about events that occurred outside the prison walls. Our decisions, however, do not clearly establish such a rule, and therefore the Court of Appeals erred in holding that this rule provides a permissible basis for federal habeas relief under the relevant provision of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (AEDPA), 28 U. S. C. §…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by565 opinions

  1. White v. WoodallSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  2. Todd Peterson v. Timothy DoumaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Vega v. TekohSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
  4. Commonwealth v. KeatonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  5. Dishon McNary v. Marcus HardyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013

560 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API