Legal Opinion

Saginaw Milling Co. v. Mower

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1908No. Docket No. 14PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Gage (William G.), J. Assumpsit by the Saginaw Milling Company against T. Dailey Mower for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

This action was originally brought in justice’s court to recover of the defendant the price of certain seeds, for which it was alleged defendant was liable. The defendant, Mower, was the owner of a farm which he had leased to one Peacock by written lease, providing, among other things, that Peacock should furnish all seed, that the title to all crops raised should be in defendant, and that he might retain out of the proceeds of his sales from Peacock’s share the amount of advances made by him, with interest at 6 per cent. Mr. Hubbard, an employé of plaintiff, who made the sale, testified:

“Apri…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Larson v. JensenMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Taylor-Woolfenden Co. v. AtkinsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Butters Salt & Lumber Co. v. VogelMichigan Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gardiner v. CourtrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Spray v. AyotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Gaines v. DurhamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
  4. In Re Kanera's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1952
  5. McGary v. Buick Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API