Legal Opinion

Butters Salt & Lumber Co. v. Vogel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1902No. Docket No. 88PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Mason; Beardsley, J. Assumpsit by the Butters Salt & Lumber Company against Albert Vogel for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

The plaintiff, in 1898 and 1899, was conducting a store at Walkerville, Mich. William Weicksall was a contractor, under contract to cut, haul, and deliver certain logs to defendant. Soon after commencing operations, in September, 1898, Weicksall began to trade *34at plaintiff’s store at Walberville. From the 23d of November until the close of operations in the spring, the plaintiff furnished merchandise to Weicksall, which was not paid for, amounting to $138.64. This action is brought upon the theory that the credit for these goods was extended solely to the defendant, and upon that theory the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Larson v. JensenMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Studley v. BarthMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Saginaw Milling Co. v. MowerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Sherman v. AlbertsMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Butters Salt & Lumber Co. v. VogelMichigan Supreme Court · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API