Legal Opinion

Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. Hall

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1903No. Docket Nos. 24, 25PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Certiorari to and appeal from Wayne; Brooke, Hosmer, and" Frazer, JJ. Condemnation proceedings by the Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad Company against Edmund Hall and Mary Hall. Respondents appeal from the award of the jury, and bring certiorari to review the anterior proceedings.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

These proceedings were brought to acquire a strip of land belonging to the respondent Hall for railroad purposes, containing 3.64 acres. The jury awarded for the taking of said land $364. Their award was confirmed by the circuit judge. The proceedings are sought to be reviewed here. There are 100 reasons assigned why the judge erred in confirming the award, and the printed record contains over 600 pages. The proceedings were commenced before. Judge Brooke, and conducted before him until directions were given for striking a jury. The jury was struck under the direction of Judge Hosmer, while…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Toledo, Ann Arbor & Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. DunlapMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Port Huron & South-Western Railway Co. v. VoorheisMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Grand Rapids, Lansing & Detroit Railroad v. WeidenMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Marquette & Southeastern Railway Co. v. LongyearMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Saginaw, Tuscola & Huron Railroad v. BordnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re Brewster Street Housing SiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Boyne City, Gaylord & Alpena Railroad v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  3. United States Gypsum Co. v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Lorf v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Saginaw Milling Co. v. MowerMichigan Supreme Court · 1908

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API