Legal Opinion

Donohoe v. Burd

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 30, 1989No. C-1-86-1156PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HERMAN J. WEBER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court upon its merits after a trial to the Court. Plaintiff claims damages for malicious prosecution and abuse of process under Ohio law. This Court has diversity jurisdiction. On the basis of the evidence, testimony and arguments presented by the parties, the Court makes the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

FINDINGS OF FACT

In 1981, plaintiff Paul J. Donohoe (“Do-nohoe”), who is presently a resident of Florida, was a citizen of West Virginia employed as a bank officer with First National Bank of Huntington in West…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Preston v. MurtyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Robert F. Jennings v. Arthur Shuman, Jr., Robert J. Conway, Gustave Naring, and John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  3. Killilea v. Sears, Roebuck Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Detling v. ChockleyOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Howard Bacon, and Private Officer, Inc. v. Joseph Patera, Patrolman, Donald Whitecar, Patrolman, Clayton CrookCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Deoma v. Shaker HeightsOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. United States v. HollandDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1999
  3. Anderson v. City of BellevueDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
  4. Bickley v. FMC Technologies, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2003
  5. Knapp v. HusaOhio Court of Appeals · 2020

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API