Legal Opinion
Deoma v. Shaker Heights
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 18, 1990No. 57049PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPatton, C.J.
Plaintiffs-appellants Joseph Deoma and Louis Narducci, appeal from a summary judgment rendered in favor of defendants City of Shaker Heights, its Mayor, Steve Alford, and its investigator; Ralph King.
The record discloses the following facts:
"[pjolice officers in Shaker Heights, Ohio would frequently undertake security work for the Shaker Heights School Board when off-duty to subsidize their incomes. It was standard practice for the school board to obtain the name of the officer who would work an event two weeks before its occurrence in order to requisition a check from the treasurer drafted…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Brenda Bickerstaff v. Vincent LucarelliCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
- Ronnie Harris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- Burkes v. StidhamOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Mayes v. City of ColumbusOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Carlton v. DavissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.