Legal Opinion
Bickley v. FMC Technologies, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided September 4, 2003No. 3:02 CV 7212PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robert E. Bickley brings this suit against defendant FMC Technologies, Inc. (“FMCT”), alleging claims under the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. (“FMLA”), and state common law claims of malicious prosecution, abuse of process, breach of implied contract, and public policy wrongful discharge. FMCT counterclaims alleging tortious interference with its business. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332. Pending are motions by both parties for summary judgment on each other’s claims. For the following reasons,…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sharp v. Waste Management, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2014
- L & N Partnership v. Lakeside Forest Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Maiden v. INDIANA & OHIO RAILWAY CO.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2005