Legal Opinion
United States v. Holland
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided February 3, 1999No. 2:97cr139PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MORGAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Defendants’ (Hollands) Applications for attorneys’ fees and litigation costs pursuant to the Hyde Amendment, the Hollands’ motion to strike a portion of the Government’s (Prosecution or Government) response to their Hyde Amendment Applications, and Richmond Newspapers, Inc.’s (RNI) motion to intervene and unseal certain documents. A hearing was held on these matters on Wednesday, August 19, 1998 and the Court indicated its findings from the bench. This Order will GRANT the Hollands’ Motion to Strike, ENTER JUDGMENT…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Perrin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dirks v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- United States v. Steven B. AisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- United States v. SherburneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. KnottCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee v. Ranger Electronic Communications, Inc., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. AdkinsonDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2003
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.