Legal Opinion
Jessica Kramer v. Toyota Motor Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 30, 2013No. 12-55050PublishedCited by 224 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge:
Toyota Motor Corporation and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (collectively “Toyota” or “Defendants”) seek review of the district court’s denial of their motion to compel arbitration. The district court held that Toyota, a nonsignatory to several agreements with arbitration provisions between Plaintiffs and various Toyota dealerships (hereinafter “Dealerships”), could not compel Plaintiffs to arbitrate with Toyota. The district court also found that Toyota had waived any right to compel arbitration by vigorously litigating this action in district court for nearly…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by224 opinions
- Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- John Murphy v. Directv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- David Tompkins v. 23andme, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Dale Mortensen v. Bresnan CommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Lincoln Griswold v. Coventry First LLCCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
219 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.