Legal Opinion
John Murphy v. Directv, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 30, 2013No. 11-57163PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
In AT & T Mobility v. Concepcion, — U.S.-, 131 S.Ct. 1740, 179 L.Ed.2d 742 (2011), the Supreme Court held that Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) preempts the State of California’s rule rendering unenforceable — as unconscionable — arbitration provisions in consumer contracts that waive collective or class action proceedings, see Discover Bank v. Superior Court, 36 Cal.4th 148, 30 Cal.Rptr.3d 76, 113 P.3d 1100 (2005) (the “Discover Bank rule”), reasoning that “[requiring the availability of classwide arbitration interferes with fundamental…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Hall Street Associates, L. L. C. v. Mattel, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- George Williams v. Yamaha Motor Corp. USACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Mohamed v. Uber Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Norcia v. Samsung Telecommunications America, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Directv, Inc. v. ImburgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Keo Ratha v. Phatthana Seafood Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.