Legal Opinion

Dale Mortensen v. Bresnan Communications

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 15, 2013No. 11-35823PublishedCited by 83 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GOULD, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a binding arbitration clause in a contract of adhesion between a commercial provider of highspeed, broadband Internet services and its customers. We consider the relationship of state and federal law and the concept of preemption in this context. 1 Dale Mortensen and Melissa Becker (“Plaintiffs”) brought this putative class action against Bresnan Communications alleging violations of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 2520-21, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, ,18 U.S.C. § 1030, and Mpntana state law for invasion of privacy…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by83 opinions

  1. Lorrie Poublon v. C.H. Robinson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. David Tompkins v. 23andme, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  3. Zenia Chavarria v. Ralphs Grocery CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. Kevin Ferguson v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  5. Dimitri Shivkov v. Artex Risk Solutions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API