Rodgers v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, a producer of cotton, seeks to reverse a judgment which mandatorily required him to file certain farm operator’s reports pursuant to the cotton marketing quota provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 31, as amended, Title 7 U.S.C.A. § 1281 et seq., and the regulations of the Secretary of Agriculture issued thereunder. The judgment also awarded the United States $3,-123.65, the sum it claimed was due the United States by reason of the cultivation and sale of cotton by appellant in excess of marketing quotas established under the Act.
Dur…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bowles v. Glick Bros. Lumber Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1945
- Cities Service Co. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1975
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.