Legal Opinion
Gelb v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 19, 1993No. 90 Civ. 7212 (LMM)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
McKENNA, District Judge.
I
Plaintiff Harold Gelb (“Plaintiff’) moves for an order pursuant to Rule 23(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure certifying a class consisting of all persons who have acquired and used the AT & T calling *77card since January 1, 1987, and who were financially responsible for payments, but not including AT & T or any of its affiliates, subsidiaries, officers or directors, and their families. In addition, Plaintiff seeks to have himself designated as representative of the class and his counsel as its counsel. In this Court’s Memorandum and Order…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Carey v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Robidoux v. CelaniCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Square D Co. v. Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gelb v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- German v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Martens v. Smith Barney, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Irwin v. MascottDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.