In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in this multidistrict securities antitrust class action have moved for class certification pursuant to Rules 23(b)(2) and (3), Fed.R.Civ.P. and to compel discovery pursuant to Rule 37(a), Fed.R.Civ.P. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiffs’ motion will be granted in part.
Parties
The parties and prior proceedings are fully set forth in several prior opinions of this court. See In re Nasdaq Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation, 894 F.Supp. 703 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (“Nasdaq I”); In re NASDAQ Market-Makers Antitrust Litigation, 164 F.R.D. 346 (S.D.N.Y.1996)…
2Cases cited141 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
136 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by208 opinions
- In Re Scrap Metal Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Thai Lao Lignite (Thailand) Co. v. Government of the Lao People's Democratic RepublicDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Bank of New York v. Meridien BIAO Bank Tanzania Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Lum v. Bank of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Goodman v. Praxair Services, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2009
203 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.