Legal Opinion
Martens v. Smith Barney, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 23, 1998No. 96 CIV. 3779(CBM)PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON PROPOSED SETTLEMENT
MOTLEY, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs filed this class action suit alleging various forms of gender discrimination by defendant Smith Barney, Inc. (“Smith Barney”) and two Smith Barney officers, James Dimon and Nicholas Cuneo. Plaintiffs also challenge the compulsory arbitration policies of defendants Smith Barney, the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), and the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”). Plaintiffs and Smith Barney reached a settlement providing revised arbitration procedures to resolve class members’ claims against Smith Barney…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Martens v. ThomannCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- In re Global Crossing Securities & Erisa LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- In Re Austrian & German Bank Holocaust LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Ansoumana v. Gristede's Operating Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Frank v. Eastman Kodak Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 2005
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.