Legal Opinion
Mouzon v. Radiancy, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 30, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0722PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
This action arises from the advertising and sale of a product called the no!no! Hair removal device (the “product”) by Defendant Radiancy, Inc. (“Radiancy”). Thirteen plaintiffs from Washington, D.C., California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Colorado, West Virginia, and Tennessee bring this putative class action against Radiancy, Inc., and its CEO Dolev Rafaeli. Together Plaintiffs bring the claims in this action on their own behalf and on behalf of a putative nationwide class, or alternatively, on…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Vasquez v. Whole Foods Mkt., Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Bauman v. ButowskyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2019
- Aston v. Johnson & JohnsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Mouzon v. Radiancy, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Mouzon v. Radiancy, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.