Legal Opinion
Mouzon v. Radiancy, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided June 19, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2014-0722PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
This action arose from the advertising and sale of a product called the nolno! Ham removal device (the “product”) by Defendant Radiancy, Inc. (“Radiancy”). Thirteen plaintiffs from Washington, D.C., California, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Virginia, Pennsylvania, Colorado, West Virginia, and Tennessee brought this putative class action against Ra-diancy, Inc., and its CEO Dolev Rafaeli. Both Rafaeli and Radiancy moved to dismiss. On March 30, 2015, the Court granted those motions. The Court dismissed the claims against…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Crown, Cork & Seal Co. v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jiggetts v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
- MSPA Claims 1, LLC v. Covington Specialty Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016
- Barryman-Turner v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Mouzon v. Radiancy, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Navarette v. Corizon LLCDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.