Legal Opinion
Mouzon v. Radiancy, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 2, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2015-1142PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge. This consolidated action represents the second coming of a putative class action regarding the no!no! Hair removal device to this Court. The Court previously dismissed all of the claims asserted in the original action, captioned Mouzon v. Radiancy and numbered 14-cv-722. Mouzon v. Radiancy, Inc., 85 F.Supp.3d 361, 367-68 (D.D.C.2015) (“Mouzon I”). Specifically, the Court dismissed certain claims with prejudice and others without prejudice. Id. The Court then deniéd the request of the Mouzon I plaintiffs to amend…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Burr v. Sherwin Williams Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Attias v. Carefirst, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2023