Legal Opinion

Hapney v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 14, 2000No. 99-732PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Justice.

Appellee Rheem Manufacturing Company petitions for rehearing of this court’s June 8, 2000, decision wherein it held that the gradual onset for back injuries specified in Ark. Code Ann. § 11 -9-102(4) (A) (ii) (b) 1 applies to injuries to the neck or cervical spine.

In reaching its decision, the majority court relied in relevant part on the case of Newberg v. Thomas Industries, 852 S.W.2d 339 (Ky. App. 1993). There, the Kentucky Court of Appeals, citing to the American Medical Association’s Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment (1st ed. 1977), held that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing v. BakerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  2. Olsten Kimberly Quality Care v. PetteySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Cooper v. Hiland DairyCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Malone v. Texarkana Public SchoolsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
  5. High Capacity Products v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Con-Agra Frozen FoodsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Cedar Chemical Co. v. KnightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
  3. Cedar Chemical Co. v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Kimble v. Labor Force, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2013
  5. Pearson v. WorksourceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API