Milwaukee Electric Crane Manufacturing Corp. v. Feil Manufacturing Co.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Stevens, J.(1) The provision of the judgment quoted above does not determine the amount of damages which the defendants therein named are entitled to recover, but it does determine that they are entitled to recover “any damages that have been sustained” by any of them. It leaves nothing open but the question of the amount of such damages, if any, that have been sustained by them. The order refusing to strike that portion of the judgment is “a final order affecting a substantial right made . . . upon a summary application in an action after judgment,” and is therefore appealable under sub. (2)…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Seyfert v. SeyfertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Zabel v. Municipal Court of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- George C. Peterson Co. v. County of IowaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
- Hoffman v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
- Packard v. Kinzie Avenue Heights Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Blankenship v. Royalty Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1953
- Hubbard v. HubbardOregon Supreme Court · 1958
- Richter v. Standard Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Agricultural Bond & Credit Corp. v. Courtenay Farmers Co-Operative Ass'nNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- Kickapoo Development Corp. v. Kickapoo Orchard Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.