Legal Opinion
Blankenship v. Royalty Holding Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1953No. 4548PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
The action out of which this appeal arises was originally filed by the Royalty Holding Company, Inc., appellee, against Daisy D. Blankenship, individually, and against her as executrix of the estate of G. T. Blankenship, deceased. The court in that action sustained her motion to dismiss as to her individually for failure to state a claim upon which a recovery could be had. The judgment of the court on the motion, as evidenced by a written journal entry, approved by the attorney for appellee, Royalty Holding Company, Inc., and for Daisy Blankenship and signed by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Puccinelli v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Milwaukee Electric Crane Manufacturing Corp. v. Feil Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- Morgan v. Scott-Mayer Commission Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1932
- Kory v. LessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
3Cited by24 opinions
- Burton v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Security Mutual Casualty Company v. Century Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Allied Materials Corporation v. Superior Products Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Martin v. MartinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Spomer v. SpomerWyoming Supreme Court · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.