Seyfert v. Seyfert

The appellant contends that he was improperly adjudged guilty of contempt, for the reason that the judgment with which it was declared he had failed to comply was effectually vacated and set aside by the order of De*226cember 3d. The respondent contends that the order of December 3d was null and void, as being beyond the power and jurisdiction of the court to make, because (1) the appeal to this court had removed the entire judgment and proceedings to this court, thereby superseding the jurisdiction of the circuit court over the judgment; (2) that the order of December 3d was made beyond the term…