Legal Opinion
Birmingham v. Berryhill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 30, 1976No. 48412PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERRY, Justice:
Plaintiff filed action for damages resulting from alleged malpractice of defendants. Trial court sustained defendants’ motion for judgment on pleadings.
Court of Appeals, Division 1, reversed and remanded with directions. Defendants petition for certiorari.
Plaintiff’s petition indicates he received injuries to his mouth and teeth in automobile accident occurring on October 1, 1972. During October 1972, he employed defend*911ant dentists. They constructed bridgework and installed it in February 1973.
Plaintiff seeks damage resulting from improper installation of bridgework. He…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- DeNike v. MoweryWashington Supreme Court · 1966
- Thornton v. Charleston Area Medical CenterWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1975
- Fieser v. St. Francis Hospital & School of Nursing, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973
- Cimino v. AlwayCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Hansen v. CollettNevada Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Hoyt v. Paul R. Miller, M.D., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Shadden v. Valley View HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996