Legal Opinion

Markley v. White

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 8, 1934No. 21563PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAndrews, J.

This is an appeal from a' judgment of the district court of Tulsa county sustaining an objection interposed by the defendant to the introduction of any testimony by the plaintiff and dismissing the plaintiff’s cause of action.

The plaintiff was injured while employed within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, and the injury was compensable. An award therefor was made by the State Industrial Commission. Thereafter he brought this action against the physicians who had been engaged by his employer to treat him. He alleged that the treatment administered by them was the cause of pain…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Adams v. Iten Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Booth & Flinn, Ltd. v. CookSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Brown v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Allen v. Elk City Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dyke v. Saint Francis Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  2. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  3. Schumacher v. LeslieSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  4. Hanson v. NortonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  5. Hughes v. Maryland Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1934

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API