Legal Opinion

Prestbye v. Kliphardt

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.

At the close of defendants’ case the plaintiff called as the first witness in rebuttal, B. L. Archer. After a few preliminary questions had been ashed of the witness, Archer, counsel for defendants objected “to any testimony on this line on the ground it is not proper rebuttal.” Whereupon one of counsel for plaintiff stated:

“We expect to show in direct rebuttal to the evidence of several witnesses for the defense who have attempted to show that there was plenty of room south or east of the pavement so that a car could have been driven over further and entirely off the pavement. We expect this…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Columbia Realty Investment Co. v. Alameda Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Harmon v. DeckerOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Booth-Kelly Lumber Co. v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Kimble v. StackpoleWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Muntz v. Cottage Hill Land Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cribbs v. Montgomery Ward & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Downey v. Traveler's InnOregon Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Rudie Wilhelm Warehouse Co. v. Royal Industries, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Edwards v. CriteserOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Eldred v. BurnsOregon Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API